The good price and quality trackless train rides is a common sightseeing vehicle. On the one hand, this model adopts the van structure of the rail train, and on the other hand, adopts the wheeled structure of the car, which makes the small train not only have the strong operating ability of the train, but also It has good mobility of cars. Therefore, from the perspective of the entire scenic sightseeing car market, the good price and quality trackless train rides have a tendency to replace traditional sightseeing cars. So as the two types of good price and quality trackless train rides, which application prospect is better, the fuel model or the battery model?

Analysis from practical application: electric trackless train rides have two drawbacks in practical applications, one is high maintenance cost, and the other is low endurance. The high maintenance cost of the electric trackless train rides is mainly reflected in the maintenance of the battery, while the low battery life is mainly reflected in the need to replenish the power in time after the electric train runs out of power , the battery life will decrease. The above-mentioned problems will not occur with the fuel-fired trackless train rides. Therefore, the fuel-fired trackless train rides has an advantageous position in practical application.
From the perspective of market policy: fuel vehicles will produce exhaust pollution, which is not in line with the current theme of "energy saving, emission reduction and green development", especially for scenic spots. Many scenic spots do not allow the use of fuel vehicles, which will inevitably restrict fuel the development of trackless train rides. Electric-driven trackless train rides have zero exhaust emissions. Therefore, electric trackless train rides have an advantage in market policies.